Group

Funding and Finance / Feed

The number one problem in nature conservation is the need for more money or access to funding. This group aims to help all WILDLABS community members with funding and financing their projects. The group is called Funding and Finance to draw attention to the possibilities of funding (i.e., grants, awards, and other gifts)  and finance (loans and venture capital investment in nature conservation projects and start-ups). These topics should be seen in their wider contexts, including that of a project or organisation’s income or business model.

discussion

How has the Funding & Finance group done?

The Funding and Finance group went live almost a year ago. We, that is the community members and group leaders, have ...published a number of resources to help you get under way...

3 3

Thank you for this amazing summary Frank! 

As someone regularly seeking conservation technology funding the posts on the resources page are very very helpful! I only just realized today that those are there and will now be checking back regularly. 

In terms of general feedback, it would be very useful to be able to subscribe to receive email notifications of new funding opportunities posted on the resources page. 

Thanks for all you do! 
 

Hi Frank,

First thanks to you, Henry, and Aurélie for making this group happen. It's much needed. This probably isn't that useful, but I find all three useful (announcements, resources, ?s). One big quest for me and others is, once you find the funding source that fits, how do you make the application easier to put together, e.g., are there parts of a proposal or application you can automate (not using AI to write, just automating the boring stuff)? Or could you utilize coding and AI to extract the necessary components from an RFP and structure the files and sections within them to then write and develop the budget? Super exciting stuff, but it gets tedious when you have a lot of proposals, each with their own slightly different requirements. 

There are some software solutions for this, but they're business oriented, expensive, and proprietary. This is really more funding solutions than funding but wondering if there's any interest in a team pursuing something that helps with this?

Best,

V

See full post
discussion

The Boring Fund 2025: Ask your questions!

Henry Rees and 2 more
 The Boring Fund supports the essential but overlooked aspects of conservation technology. With the support of Arm, $80,000 in grants will go to critical, foundational...

24 8

Hello Henry

Can someone submit more than one application with different ideas?

See full post
discussion

The Boring Fund 2024: Ask your questions!

AboutThe Boring Fund supports the essential but overlooked aspects of conservation technology. With the support of Arm, $50,000 in grants will go to critical, foundational...

31 12

Thanks! That’s something to consider then! I always think abt going to Huaqiangbei market in Shenzhen, and buying there for big savings. But it feels like it might a recipe for getting scammed,  if you don’t speak the language!

Hi,
I lost track of the timeline; the Green Box submitted an idea for development, but I have not received any further communication. Could you please remind me what the timetable is, and if we will get feedback on our applications (knowing we are not the only ones with ideas, I can imagine the workload this has given)?

I am looking forward to your reply and insights.
Best wishes,
Gijs

How to submit a proposal for the Boring Fund on the Platform ?

See full post
discussion

Anyone using InVEST?

InVEST 3.16.0 has been release! with a new Plugin feature. From the InVEST Workbench users can install a 3rd party InVEST-like model which can be...

3 1

If you're curious about InVEST I just created a page in "The Inventory" (see link on this page) with some resources and just wanted to hlighlight some potentially interesting models that are worth having a look at!

  • Habitat Quality: this model uses habitat quality and rarity as proxies to represent the biodiversity of a landscape, estimating the extent of habitat and vegetation types across a landscape, and their state of degradation.
  • Habitat Risk Assessment: this model evaluates risks posed to coastal and marine habitats in terms of exposure to human activities and the habitat-specific consequence of that exposure for delivery of ecosystem services.
  • Crop Pollination: this model focuses on wild pollinators providing an ecosystem service. The model estimates insect pollinator nest sites, floral resources, and flight ranges to derive an index of pollinator abundance on each cell on a landscape. If desired, the model can creates an index of the value of these pollinators to agricultural production, and attributes this value back to source cells.

     

Hi Elsa, 

We have used InVEST for a pollinator project we supported (the crop pollination model - details here), and looking to using it more for marine and coastal applications so really appreciate the details you shared here! 

Cheers, 

Liz

See full post
discussion

Championing Decentralized Energy for Sustainable Growth & Regenerative Financele here

Mr. Tumi – Chief Visionary Officer, Ena PlusChampioning Decentralized Energy for Sustainable Growth & Regenerative FinanceAs the Chief Visionary...

3 0

Thank you for bringing our attention to regenerative finance, Mr. Tumi. I appreciate it very much, and would like to learn more about this. Could you please refer to online sources describing that financial philosophy and the mini-grid systems?

Hi Yusuf! Thanks for sharing this. What are you looking for from the WILDLABS community? (Collaborators, advice, networking, etc.) 

See full post
article

How to speak investors’ language?

To effectively engage with an investor, it's best to grasp key financial and strategic concepts, and understand how an investor thinks. Let's cover the basics

2 3
Thank you for the interesting article. For academia-based biologists, we dont have inherent training on finance and investment training. We often cant find, or sometimes refuse to...
Thank you Jonathan for your message! Indeed this is exactly the gap we are trying to bridge. Is there any specific sort of training/resources/webinar that would be of interesting...
See full post
careers

Investment Team Member

Superorganism is the first venture capital firm dedicated entirely to biodiversity-positive startups, and they are seeking a new investment team to source and support biodiversity-positive startups.

1
See full post
funding

Conservation Nation Grant Program

The Conservation Nation Grant Program provides funding to help save endangered animals and their ecosystems by building a stronger, more diverse community of conservation practitioners.

2
See full post
article

The Boring Fund 2025: Further Information

Henry Rees and 2 more
Are you interested in applying for The Boring Fund 2025? On this page you can find more information for this opportunity which provides up to $12,500 per project in funding for essential but overlooked aspects of...

1 3
I sounds like an amazing opportunity and I sure would love to be part of the conversation.
See full post
funding

The Boring Fund 2025: Apply Today

Henry Rees and 2 more
The Boring Fund supports the essential but overlooked aspects of conservation technology. In response to overwhelming demand in 2024, we’ve partnered again with Arm to provide more funding. In 2025, a total of $80,000...

10
See full post
discussion

New Group Proposal: Systems Builders & PACIM Designers

Co-Creating Collective Impact Across the Conservation Technology EcosystemDear WILDLABS Community,I am proposing the creation of a new WILDLABS group focused on...

6 2

Hi Chad,

Thanks for the text. As I read it, PACIMs play a role in something else/bigger, but it doesn't explain what PACIMs are or what they look like. Now I've re-read your original post, I'm thinking, maybe I do understand, but then I feel the concept is too big (  an entire system can be part of a PACIM ? ) to get going within a WildLabs group. And you want to develop 10 PACIMS within a year through this group? Don't get me wrong, I am all for some systems change, but perhaps you're aiming too high. 

Hello again sir - PACIMs really mean 'projects' is the way I see it. Each part of the acronym can be seen as a project (if you have an assignment to do, you have a project really).

 

As for your query on 10 projects in 'this' group - I should ask for clarification if you mean particularly acoustics or in any group (I see now this is the acoustics thread after I selected all the groups for this post). If you are asking on acoustics, you're right - I am unsure on 10 as I am not too keen on acoustics yet. If you are asking 10 projects as a whole like 10 projects in the funding and finance group - I believe 10 to be a very reasonable number. Our projects we have co-created are for the most part replicable, rapidly deployable, quickly scalable, fundable through blended finance and more. 

 

Thank you again for the feedback.

Thank you for your reply, Chad

I meant 10 as a whole, indeed. Perhaps you see your post in one group, but since it is tagged for all groups, I assumed you meant 10 in total.

In your first post you explain PACIM stands for "Projects, Assignments, Campaigns, Initiatives, Movements, and Systems", so I understood it as more than just projects. Obviously, many things can be packed into a project or called a project, but then, what does it mean that 'Projects' is part of the list?

Well, if you think 10 projects is doable, then don't let me stop you.

See full post
article

Help the Funding and Finance group

The Funding and Finance group will soon go into it's second year of existence. Do you feel like joining the team of group leaders?

2 0
Hi Frank thank you. I am keen on this, however I am not sure if I am going to meet the requirements to start a group. Open for anything, thank you.
See full post
discussion

Field-Ready Bioacoustics System in Field Testing 

Hi all — I’m Travis, an automation engineer and conservation tech builder currently testing a system I’ve developed called Orpheus: a fully integrated, field-...

4 3

Hi Carly,

Thanks so much for your thoughtful message—and for introducing me to Freaklabs! BoomBox looks awesome, and it’s exciting to see how closely our goals align. There’s definitely potential for collaboration, and I’d be happy to chat more. Their system is super efficient and I think both of our systems have a place in this space. 

Affordability and reliability were key considerations when I started building Orpheus. I wanted to create something rugged enough to survive in the field year-round while still being accessible for conservationists with limited budgets. The full-featured unit is €1500, and the basic model is €800. That pricing reflects both the hardware and the considerable time I’ve spent writing and refining the system—it’s all about balancing performance, durability, and keeping it sustainable for the long term.

Even the base unit is more than just a playback device. It logs every playback event, duration, and species, with enough onboard storage for two years of data, and it automatically converts the logs to line protocol for easy integration into platforms like InfluxDB.

On top of that, Orpheus actively logs and graphs temperature, humidity, atmospheric pressure, and battery voltage. During deep sleep, it interpolates the environmental data to preserve meaningful trends without wasting energy. You can view any of these on it's 5" touch screen or view it in the cross-platform app that will support both Android and IOS once I'm done programming it.

As for audio specs:

  • Recording is supported up to 96kHz,
  • Playback is full 24-bit, both MP3 and WAV formats
  • The system currently supports recording audio clips, reviewing them, and even adding those clips directly to playlists on the device.

That said, for bat research, I know ultrasonic capability is essential. While the current hardware doesn’t capture over 100kHz, I’ve already done the research and identified alternative audio interfaces that would support that range. If that’s a need researchers are interested in, I’d be open to building out a dedicated version to meet those requirements.

Power-wise, it runs indefinitely on solar, even under partly cloudy conditions. It uses a LiFePO₄ battery, and depending on usage, it can operate for up to two weeks on battery alone. It also supports external power from 12V or 24V systems, and solar input from 12V to 70V, so it’s pretty adaptable to various field setups. it also can operate from -5 to 70C (still testing that), but the hardware should be capable according to specs. Your correct though in places like the rain forest that could be challenging and an alternative would need to be considered. 

The software is written modularly to allow for expansion based on user needs. For instance, I’ve already integrated support for a rain sensor that can pause playback if the user chooses that, and could easily include PIR, microwave, or other sensors for more specialized triggers.

Regarding durability, I’m currently testing mesh cable sheathing to deter rodents and other wildlife from chewing the wires—this was a concern raised by one of the teams using Orpheus, and I’m designing around it.

Also, Orpheus includes a seasonal scheduling engine—you can define your own seasons (like Migration, Breeding, etc.) and assign unique playback playlists to each. The device uses astronomical data (sunrise/sunset) based on your provided lat/lon and time zone, and automatically adjusts timing offsets like “1 hour before sunrise.” The goal is truly fire-and-forget deployment.

I'm open to adding any features or sensors that might be useful within reason.

I’m curious though, what specs would make a recording device for bats an indispensable tool? What features don’t already exist  on the market that should?


 

Warm regards,
Travis

I love the look of the system! We almost called our new sensor Orpheus, but decided against it as there is already a microphone named that! I'd love to see a bit more about the technical implementation! Is this running off of a CM5 or something different? 

Hi Ryan, hmm, I had no idea there was a microphone named that. I thought about how it’s used to lure birds for netting, and I like Greek Mythology. I thought it was a perfect fit, but hmm, May have to change the name. I considered using a CM, but i wanted the system to be as efficient as possible. I am using a RPI Zero 2 W with emmc. To ensure the UI stays  responsive I used some backend tricks like thread pooling. It works well and resources stay in check. The challenging part is ensuring thread handling is done gracefully and carefully to prevent race conditions. What sort of sensor have you been developing?

See full post
article

Announcing the WILDLABS Awards 2025 Grantees

Learn about the 15 selected projects that are working to innovate, scale, and adopt conservation technology for this year’s WILDLABS Awards. 

4 6
Hooray! Looking forward to another great year of mothing thanks to you all!
Please, meet the Ambiance team and discuss with them here: 
Hoping for a good run for the next call for proposals! Congrats for everyone who got approved!
See full post
discussion

Must profit be part of the environmental solution?

In this LinkedIn articlehttps://www.linkedin.com/pulse/moral-dimension-why-profit-must-part-environmental-rich-stockdale-phd-r18se/Rich Stockdale argues for 'yes'. I may not agree...

33 1
Hej Travis, . Thank you so much for sharing your experience. And your passion which must be shared by many if not all WildLAbs members! . I think you are summarising the current status of affairs in nature conservation, we build and conserve because it must be done, but it’s clearly not enough. Hence my thought: what if people could earn money ( like, a decent income, or even a lot of money), would that work as a motivator for a massive drive of activities towards nature conservation? You seem to be arriving at a similar conclusion for the sake of tech development, ie for technical innovation. I would seek more innovation in social and economic thinking on nature conservation and how it is organised and financed. Profit seeking could be such an innovation. . Cheers . Frank . PS sorry for my late response. Your message arrived in the midst of mi move from Costa Rica to Spain, so I’ve spent little time on WildLabs and the theme I had I had to spend on my share in organising the upcoming webinar on sustainable income streams for open source projects.

I think you answered your own question Frank. If grants are out of the question and you actually want results at scale, profit is your only option. For the people/companies with something to offer and no funds in any case.

In my opinion, wildlife initiatives as a commercial target alone I would say is even harder than the more general IT market as the wildlife market is much smaller market with limited funding, especially this year.  So that means that the company is likely going to have to target normal markets to be viable, with wildlife as a side project for them in principle in the most cases. And there's a limited commercial market for wildlife initiatives, so philantrophy would likely also have to be part of the equation.

In today's world with a lot of horrific people with a lot of power, we need to encourage people to realise that success is not just about making money, but also about being a good person and contributing to the planet. Unfortunately, a lot of people with enormous amounts of money and enormous egos seem to equate success only with money and greed. With a few exceptions. We need more exceptions.

I very much agree. It is a shame that companies/organisations are willing to spend so much to take from the earth and so little to give back. In the example I come from, we are a team of pure citizen scientists that give all our time for free to perform shark research. In my case, those same volunteers often use money from their own back pocket to keep the project going. We also rely heavily on the generosity of Conservation X to keep our software running and the servers alive.

Technology is not cheap to run. Every server uses electricity and as we all know its going up in price. 

It is a very scary situation when I know that all shark research that we are performing with Spot a Shark (and is being relied on by scientists to publish studies) is funded by nothing more than favours and donations. If that all ended tomorrow, do we just stop all research, awareness, campaigning etc and hope for the best?  

My view is that it ultimately comes down to the government to ensure that conservation is valued. Take extra taxes from the wealthy organisations / banks etc and fund this stuff. I am sure if people like Mark Zuckerberg etc can afford a $900k watch to wear on their wrist, they could afford to support conservation. 

See full post